Weblog

Apple 27″ iMac (late 2009) Core i5 and Core i7 benchmarks are out

Just a quick update for the Apple 27″ iMacs (late 2009). The first benchmark results have arrived for the 27″ iMac Core i5 and 27″ iMac Core i7. Geekbench 2 shows even faster results in 64-Bit mode.

I’ve updated the chart to correct a small error because the Core i5 result wasn’t taken with the same Geekbench version as the others. Now all results are taken with Geekbench 2 version 2.1.4 and with OS X 10.6.2. I’ve also added the latest Mac Pro models (early 2009) so that you can better compare the results.

Update: Bare Feats now also has benchmark results for the Core i7, Core i5 compared to the early 2009 Mac Pro’s.

Here are the results:

2009-imac-mac-pro-compared

results taken from Geekbench website: iMac Core i5 2.66Ghz, iMac Core i7 2.8Ghz, iMac Core 2 Duo 3.33Ghz, iMac Core 2 Duo 3.06Ghz, Mac Pro 2.93Ghz (1 CPU), Mac Pro 2.93Ghz (2 CPUs)

26 Responses to “Apple 27″ iMac (late 2009) Core i5 and Core i7 benchmarks are out”

  1. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by t_royer: benchmark results compared for Apple’s latest iMac lineup from 3.06 to Core i7 2.8Ghz http://tr.im/EU7s

  2. [...] iMac met de Core2Duo, en de prestaties zijn duidelijk verbeterd. Ook de iMac 27″ i7 is vergeleken, met onder andere de i5 en het resultaat is erg [...]

  3. [...] Originally Posted by Eug  iMac 11,1 GeekBench scores Core i7 64-bit – 9638 (int 8537, fp 14895) Core i7 32-bit – 8410 (int 6857, fp 14006) Core i5 64-bit – 7131 (int 6584, fp 10126) iMac 10,1 GeekBench scores 3.33 GHz 64-bit – 5131 3.33 GHz 32-bit – 4707 3.06 GHz 64-bit – 4694 3.06 GHz 32-bit – 4324 Mac Pro 2.8 GHz (early 2008) 32-bit Mac Pro 2.8 GHz (early 2008) 64-bit MacPro4,1 2.92 GHz (early 2009) 64-bit – 16455 [...]

  4. [...] the i7 gives a pretty significant bump over even the i5, which dominates the 2 core chips too. Timon Royer Mediendesign Blog Archive Apple 27″ iMac (late 2009) Core i5 and Core i7 benchmark… __________________ me on last.fm – behold my ungodly taste in music My band on [...]

  5. [...] Le prime consegne dei nuovi  iMac con processore Intel Core i7, oltre a catturare l’attenzione mediatica per via del classico “unboxing” (in realtà all’esterno sono uguali al modello [...]

  6. [...] Blogger Timon Royer has posted lots of benchmark results too. You should check those out here. [...]

  7. Apple iPod says:

    Cheers for the update :D
    Gunna get the new iMac for christmas! :D

  8. [...] scores for the new i7 iMacs have been reported. The best visual representation is provided by this blog entry at Timon-Royer.com which compiled the Geekbench scores across all currently shipping [...]

  9. pauln says:

    Could you perhaps compare these results with geekbench scores for Mac Pros?

  10. [...] only costs $200 extra. Timon-Royer’s telling graph uses results from the Geekbench Website. [Timon-Royer via [...]

  11. [...] > Macrumors > Timon-Royer Tags: 27 inch imac, Apple, cheep speed, core 2 duo, core i5, core i7, core i7 imac benchmarks, [...]

  12. [...] costs $US200 extra. Timon-Royer’s telling graph uses results from the Geekbench Website. [Timon-Royer via MacRumors] Tagged:applebenchmarkschartscomputercomputerscore i5core [...]

  13. [...] do site do Geekbench e também mostra os resultados de iMacs com Core 2 Duo e de dois Macs Pro. [Timon-Royer via [...]

  14. [...] Timon Royer przedstawił na swoim blogu porównanie najnowszych iMaków z Makami Pro. Wyniki przedstawiono w wykresie: [...]

  15. [...] de rendimiento en sus nuevos equipos. Pero eso parece ser que eran casos más bien aislados, porque han aparecido pruebas de rendimiento que demuestran que el iMac tope de gama es una máquina brutal que ha evolucionado bastante bien. [...]

  16. [...] cow. Tim Royer has posted a graph of GeekBench benchmark test suite scores for the iMac 27″ Core i5 and iMac [...]

  17. [...] iMac Core i5 and i7 benchmarks → [...]

  18. Denos says:

    RAM? – Do these Macs all have the same RAM? What are the numbers.
    GPUs? What are the video cards. The 27″ iMac is a ATI 4850.
    The Mac Pro? A 4870?

    How comparable are these results without the configurations?
    And that’s not even mentioning OpenCL!

  19. TR says:

    GPU doesn’t matter since Geekbench only measures the CPU and memory performance. From what I’ve seen the amount of RAM isn’t that important for the benchmark.

  20. gno says:

    Does anyone know if the Mac Pro benchmarks are from “Nehalem” Xeons?

    On second thought, it may not matter that much when the next generation Mac Pros start shipping with faster Core i7 Xeons…

    That’s may be about the same time that buyers who were seriously considering Mac Pro’s (and bought Core i7 iMacs instead) may be looking back at how they got there…

    Business as usual.

  21. TR says:

    These are the latest Mac Pros available (early 2009, Nehalem).

  22. [...] to gain from this investment, especially when you keep in mind that the iMac stock configuration is able to keep up with the current Mac Pro Quad-Core. So while it’s possible your money is probably spent better on more RAM instead of faster [...]

  23. Trexuphigh says:

    I bought the i7 IMac with 8GB RAM. At work I support year old Mac Pros with dual Xeons and 8GB of RAM. Using XBench The iMac scores a 220 and the Mac Pros clock in at 145.

  24. [...] go-to system for most Mac professional.” Similar specs were posted by Tim Royer on his blog where he ran Geekbench 2 benchmarks on i5 and i7 Imacs versus Mac Pro Desktops and Dual Core [...]